“You
guys don’t know anything.” This statement is repeated over and over again in
the media, complete with “social critics” who preach with vitriol and
condescension that the youngest generation is stupider and lazier then their
own generation was. These specific words, by Mark Bauerlain in his book The Dumbest Generation, are not only
incredibly insulting, but they are downright wrong. These scare tactics are
simply used as moneymakers, to sell books and magazines to the target audience:
aging adults. They praise the intelligence of the eldest members of our
society, while discrediting the minds of the youth. It is wholly ignorant and
disrespectful to throw the misnomer of “ The Dumbest Generation” on to those
below thirty; not only is this an argument that has been repeated every
generation for hundreds of years, but it is also evident that it is not true.
Intelligence is not failing: in fact, in some areas it is actually improving.
One
way to discredit the claim that Millennials constitute the dumbest generation
is to simply study the history. Older generation’s claiming that the Youngers
are dumber than them is a cycle that is repeated every generation. A prime
example of this is in an article by R. Smith Simpson, Are We Getting Our Share of the Best? In it he asserts, “ My
initial surprise was to find among the candidates (Americans) an abysmal
ignorance of so elementary a subject as the geography of the United States.”
Many of those who claim that those under thirty lack the knowledge that they
held, would wholeheartedly agree with this statement. They would then be
surprised to know that this article was in fact written in 1962, and spoke
about their own generation. The constant fretting of the pundits (Source 7) is
a cycle whose repetition is as predictable as the changing of the seasons.
Not
only are these arguments trite and unspecific, but they are simply wrong. A
study from Stanford University found that people today write more than in
generations ever before. And, unlike in previous generations, 38% of writing
took place outside of the classroom (Source 7). Additionally, the study found
new skills had been learned by students such as online communication and
technical literacy. These new online worlds have opened up new arenas of
thought, allowing students to, “ dive into a topic or thought.” (Source 3). Not
only have traditional skills like writing and IQ not fallen behind, but new
skills like technological aptitude have leapt ahead.
It
is clear that the argument that modern critics pose is wrong. Their judgment of the young adult generation as
being the farthest behind intellectually is based on lazy stereotypes and lazy
generalizations. As much as they want to see failings in youth, as every older
generation has done for centuries, the facts do not support their claim. The
Millennials are not only not falling behind, but they are actually learning new
and diverse skills through the prevalence of technology. Just because the older
segment of society is not able to see change does not negate it. So maybe these
critics – so quick to judge – should open up a book themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment